Skip to content

Conversation

@sb-benohe
Copy link
Collaborator

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements/requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
importlib-resources 5.12.0 requires zipp, which is not installed.
importlib-metadata 6.6.0 requires zipp, which is not installed.
django-oauth-toolkit 2.2.0 requires jwcrypto, which is not installed.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 111/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: High, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: High, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.00045, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 39, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: High, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 5.99, Likelihood: 1.84, Score Version: V5
Type Confusion
SNYK-PYTHON-CRYPTOGRAPHY-7886970
cryptography:
42.0.8 -> 43.0.1
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 49/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: Low, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.00053, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 68, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Medium, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 2.35, Likelihood: 2.06, Score Version: V5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7642790
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 49/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: Low, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.00053, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 68, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Medium, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 2.35, Likelihood: 2.06, Score Version: V5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7642791
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 49/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: Low, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.00053, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 68, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Medium, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 2.35, Likelihood: 2.06, Score Version: V5
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7642813
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit
critical severity 202/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: High, Integrity impact: High, Availability impact: High, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.00068, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 68, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Critical, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 9.79, Likelihood: 2.06, Score Version: V5
SQL Injection
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7642814
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 44/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: Low, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: None, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: High, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.01055, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 40, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Medium, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 2.35, Likelihood: 1.86, Score Version: V5
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7886958
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 50/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: None, Integrity impact: None, Availability impact: Low, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: No data, User Interaction (UI): None, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.01055, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 40, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: Medium, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 2.35, Likelihood: 2.08, Score Version: V5
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-7886959
django:
4.2.14 -> 4.2.16
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Type Confusion
🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)
🦉 SQL Injection
🦉 More lessons are available in Snyk Learn

@sb-benohe sb-benohe closed this Oct 14, 2024
@sb-benohe sb-benohe deleted the snyk-fix-699921c2ad753cb343ff9240df3469fb branch April 29, 2025 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants